Social media is a place
where everyone releases everything or at least most of thoughts that run
through their minds without any type of filtration. This is fine, right? Isn’t
that one of the advantages of social media (at least in appropriate situation)?
Most people think so, even if they decide to delete any previous rambles they
regret sharing after a moment of clarity.
What does the Department of Homeland Security have to say
about all this? Of course, they defend their actions. It was said that their
only focus was on attaining information on natural disasters and other major occurrences.
It was claimed that the only names released in reports are those needed for
credibility and nothing else. Reference groups typically are used by other
individuals to asses themselves, and this is exactly what the department claims
to be doing through the comments made by the public.
Government representatives believe that this ordeal needs
to be monitored at a great level so the trust and peace of the public can be retained.
I’m sure there are plenty of responses for this happening
by individuals. Are we supposed to conform to keeping our ideas off the
internet? It seems as though several government personnel is concerned with
individuals thinking this way, simply to keep their selves and their
information out of the sights of the Department of Homeland Security.
What do you think? Are you still willing to share your
thoughts freely?
Article
can be found at: http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/250124/lawmakers_question_dhs_monitoring_of_social_media.html
By:
Vanessa Torres
No comments:
Post a Comment